Carbonomics
National and International Energy Policy
Power System Economics
Steven  Stoft
Library Papers Printable
 
 
  Home
My Papers
Copenhagen ♦
Opinion Pieces
 
Approaching Copenhagen
 
 
  Op-eds on the approach to Copenhagen
 
 
  Reinventing Kyoto:  Why it failed.  What to do.
June 30, 2009.   How Offsets Defeated the Kyoto Protocol  PDF
International offsets make it profitable for poor countries to reject all forms of commitment including caps. But offsets, are too weak and corrupt to replace caps on emissions.  
June 29, 2009.    Flexible Global Carbon Pricing  PDF
An international carbon-pricing mechanism that allows caps for Europe and carbon taxes for those who reject caps and want financial predictability. For a non-technical description, read Carbonomics, Part 4.
(For a related global-carbon-pricing paper, see Richard Cooper)
 
 
 
Flexible Global Carbon Pricing
Abstract
The Kyoto Protocol’s approach of assigning emission targets, or “caps,” exacerbates problems with international cooperation and commitment. This has caused the developing countries, which account for the fastest growing half of emissions, to reject caps. Global carbon pricing addresses these problems and, with less risk and more reward, can generate and sustain stronger policies.
This paper proposes a system, “flexible global carbon pricing,” designed to upgrade the Kyoto Protocol by allowing a carbon tax in place of a carbon cap. It provides backward-compatibility with the Kyoto Protocol by allowing un-modified cap and trade as well. Instead of many national caps, the proposal sets a global target price for carbon and specifies a pair of incentives.
The Pricing Incentive rewards nations that set their carbon price higher than the global target and penalizes nations that underachieve. These rewards and penalties sum to zero by design. The strength of the Pricing Incentive is adjusted automatically so that the global average carbon price converges to the global target price.
The Clean Development Incentive (CDI), free from the gaming problems that plague the U.N.’s Clean Development Mechanism, encourages full participation by low-emission countries. An example, based on a $20 price target, causes transfers from the United States of only seven cents per capita per day. Nevertheless, India’s CDI receipts cover its compliance costs. The example shows that low costs can be guaranteed.

 


http://stoft.com/p/134.html | 02/09/10 09:27 GMT
Modified: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:18:52 GMT
 
Carbonomics-120w
Amazon
China and India have nixed caps. Without these caps, Kyoto fails. What can be done?
Carbonomics explains "wrecking" the economy, "peak oil," caps, carbon taxes, and Kyoto.
About Carbonomics.
Get discount.